High Court of Judicature at Allahabad observed no one appeared to press the writ petition and the list was revised; the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution and interim orders vacated.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution and interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 925 of 2019
Petitioner :- Laikuddin Qureshi Respondent :- State Of U P And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brij Gopal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
List revised.
Nobody appears to press this petition whereas learned Standing Counsel is present.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 19.1.2023 S.Chaurasia
Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Laikuddin Qureshi
State Of U P
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
