Petition dismissed as infructuous since the payment in question had already been made to the petitioner, rendering the cause of action no longer surviving.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1144 of 2023
Petitioner :- Udai Bhan And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deepankar Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Diptiman Singh,Ravindra Singh
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Case called out. No one is present on behalf of the petitioners.
Shri Ravindra Singh, learned counsel for the contesting respondent states that the cause for filing the present writ petition no more survives, as the payment has already been made to the petitioner.
In view of above, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This order has been passed in due assistance of Shri Satyam Singh, learned Standing counsel for the State-respondent.
Order Date :- 18.1.2023 Bhanu
Digitally signed by :- BHANU PRATAP KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Udai Bhan And 2 Others
State Of U.P. And3 Others
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
