The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed a writ petition for want of prosecution as none of the petitioners appeared. The interim order, if any, stands discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10433 of 2018
Petitioner :- Saurabh Nigam And 9 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anand Kumar Singh,Pankaj Roy,Vivek Verma
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None appears on behalf of the petitioners.
Sri Vivek Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5 states that the cause for filing the present writ petition as per pleadings set up by the petitioners no more survives.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 18.1.2023 Jaswant
Digitally signed by :- JASWANT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Saurabh Nigam And 9 Others
State Of U.P. And 5 Others
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
