Disposed

Tufail Ahmad v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC14 Mar 2023WRIC/6950/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dr. J.S.P.P.C. disposed of a writ petition seeking expeditious disposal of a pending revenue case. The court directed the Tehsildar to conclude proceedings within four months, allowing personal appearance if lawyers fail to cooperate.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent Tehsildar to conclude case proceedings expeditiously within four months; personal appearance permitted if lawyers do not cooperate.

Tufail Ahmad Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6950 of 2023 Petitioner :- Tufail Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Adeel Ahmad Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudhir Bharti

¶2

Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

¶3

Heard Shri Adeel Ahmad Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel representing the Staterespondents.

¶4

This writ petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Case No.03586 of 2019 (Computerized Case No.T201905470303856) (Smt. Sadiya v. Abdul Salam @ Abusalam) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code-2006 within stipulated period.

¶5

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.

¶6

Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶7

In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2-Tehsildar, Tehsil Nautanwan, District-Maharajganj to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.

¶8

In case, the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.

¶9

Order Date :- 14.3.2023 J.S.P.P.C.

¶10

Digitally signed by :- JYOTSANA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Tufail Ahmad v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tufail Ahmad v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

U.P. State Construction and Infrastructure Development Co. Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Ravi Kumar Vs Additional Commissioner Meerut Division and 68 Others

Naseebullah Khan Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sant Lal Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Jagdeesh Prasad Tiwari Vs Honble Member of Board of Revenue and 2 Others

Jang Bahadur Vs State of U.P. and 27 Others