Dismissed

Jagdeesh Prasad Tiwari v. Honble Member of Board of Revenue and 2 Others

Allahabad HC14 Mar 2023WRIC/6909/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a direction for the expeditious disposal of a pending revenue case involving the petitioner and the State. The court directed the Member of Board of Revenue, District Prayagraj, to conclude the case within six months, allowing personal appearance if lawyers fail to cooperate.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Member of Board of Revenue, District Prayagraj to conclude proceedings of Case No. REV/1513/2020 within six months, permitting personal appearance in case of lawyer non-cooperation.

Jagdeesh Prasad Tiwari Vs Honble Member of Board of… — Landlord and Tenant | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 52

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6909 of 2023

¶3

Petitioner :- Jagdeesh Prasad Tiwari Respondent :- Honble Member Of Board Of Revenue And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Lal Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- CSC

¶4

Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Amit Tripathi, holding brief of Sri Ram Lal Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel representing the Staterespondents.

¶6

This petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Case No.REV/1513/2020/Lalitpur (Computerized Case No.AL2020064500513) (Harprasad Vs. State and others) within a stipulated period.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.

¶8

Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶9

In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Member of Board of Revenue, District Prayagraj (respondent no.1) to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.

¶10

In case the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.

¶11

Order Date :- 14.3.2023 AKShukla/-

¶12

Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jagdeesh Prasad Tiwari v. Honble Member of Board of Revenue and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagdeesh Prasad Tiwari v. Honble Member of Board of Revenue and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

U.P. State Construction and Infrastructure Development Co. Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Ravi Kumar Vs Additional Commissioner Meerut Division and 68 Others

Naseebullah Khan Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sant Lal Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Jang Bahadur Vs State of U.P. and 27 Others

Tufail Ahmad Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others