In a writ petition filed by U.P. State Construction And Infrastructure Development Co. against the State of U.P., no party appeared to argue the matter. The High Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18687 of 2016
Petitioner :- U.P. State Construction And Infrastructure Development Co. Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjiv Singh,Vivek Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,S. Shekhar
Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
List revised.
No one has put in appearance to argue the matter.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 13.3.2023 Jyotsana
Digitally signed by :- JYOTSANA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. State Construction And Infrastructure Development Co.
State Of U.P.
Kshitij Shailendra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
