The petitioner failed to appear to press the writ petition even after a revised call. The High Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:133044-DB
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 52664 of 2013
Petitioner :- Banke Bihari Tiwari Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- P.N. Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.I.(2013/7812),Abrar Ahmad
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. None appears for the petitioner to press the petition even in revised call. Sri Abrar Ahmad is present for the respondents.
2. The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Order Date :- 6.7.2023 Jaideep/-
Digitally signed by :- JAIDEEP BANERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Banke Bihari Tiwari
Union Of India
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Manish Kumar Nigam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
