The Allahabad High Court dismissed the writ petition since no one appeared to press the matter even in a revised call.
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:133040-DB
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 41082 of 2013
Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Pandey And 21 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashish K. Ojha,Neeraj Tiwari,Pratik Chandra,Vaibhavv Kaushik
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. None appears for the petitioners to press the petition even in revised call. Ms. Tanya Mishra, holding brief of Sri Rohit Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent, is present.
2. The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Order Date :- 6.7.2023 Jaideep/-
Digitally signed by :- JAIDEEP BANERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ajay Kumar Pandey And 21 Others
State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And 4 Others
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Manish Kumar Nigam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
