The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the petitioner on the fixed date for hearing. The interim order, if any, was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4644 of 2022
Petitioner :- Rajaram Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Harish Chandra Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Deepak Gaur
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Even in the revised call, none present on behalf of the petitioner.
Learned Standing counsel for the State respondent is present. Sri Deepak Gaur, learned counsel for respondent is also present.
The writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution .
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 12.12.2023 Shaswat
Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajaram Yadav
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
Shaswat Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
