The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner was not present in the revised call. Any interim order was vacated.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38852 of 2023
Petitioner :- Abdul Rasheed Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Pandey,Vinkesh Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arun Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Even in the revised call, none present on behalf of the petitioner. Learned Standing counsel for the State respondent is present.
The writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution .
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 12.12.2023 Shaswat
Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Rasheed
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
