This court dismissed the writ petition as the petitioner admitted taking the loan and failing to repay it. Equity did not favour her refusal to deposit an amount to show bona fide. The respondent bank is at liberty to pursue legal recovery measures.
Petitioner to return loan amount; Respondent Bank at liberty to take legal measures for recovery.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 395 of 2023
Petitioner :- Sutani Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Autar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Sanjai Singh
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Order Date :- 10.2.2023 AK
Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is liable to repay a loan amount taken by her.
Sutani Devi
State of U.P.
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
