A writ petition directed the Sub-Divisional Magistrate to decide a pending revenue case under the U.P. Revenue Code within four months, failing to comply with statutory timelines.
Directed respondent no.2 to decide the pending revenue case on merits within four months after giving hearing to parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:205451
Court No. - 51
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36904 of 2023
Petitioner :- Satendra Bahadur Srivastava And 11 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajeet Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
Order Date :- 27.10.2023 Rameez
Digitally signed by :- RAMEEZ AHMED High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Sub-Divisional Magistrate is directed to decide a pending revenue case expeditiously.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Satendra Bahadur Srivastava And 11 Others
State Of U.P. And 5 Others
Chandra Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
