Petitioner sought mandamus directing the Tehsildar to decide pending proceedings under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
Petition disposed of with liberty to file contempt if respondent fails to comply with existing directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:224484
Court No. - 47
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36859 of 2023
Petitioner :- Mahendra Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudhir Bharti
Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
Order Date :- 28.11.2023 A.Kr.
Digitally signed by :- AJAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Daya Shankar vs. State of U.P. and 4 othersDistinguished¶8
Daya Shankar vs. State of U.P. and 4 others ; 2023(6) ADJ 181
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahendra Kumar Yadav
State Of U.P.
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
