In this writ petition, the petitioner sought direction to expedite proceedings filed under the U.P. Land Revenue Code, 2006. The High Court disposed of the matter by following the guidelines previously laid down in the Daya Shankar judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:224066
Court No. - 47
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35870 of 2023
Petitioner :- Vindhyachal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Girja Shanker Mishra,Pratiksha Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi
Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
Order Date :- 28.11.2023 S.Chaurasia
Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present petition for direction to expedite proceedings under the U.P. Land Revenue Code, 2006 may be disposed of in light of the guidelines laid down in the Daya Shankar judgment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Daya Shankar vs. State of U.P. and 4 othersFollowed¶8
2023 (6) ADJ 181
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vindhyachal
State Of U.P.
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
