Samim Bano v. State of U.P. and 5 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed a writ petition in default due to the non-appearance of the petitioner to press the matter. No substantive decision on the legal questions was delivered.
This court dismissed a writ petition in default due to the non-appearance of the petitioner to press the matter. No substantive decision on the legal questions was delivered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35903 of 2022 Petitioner :- Samim Bano Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Tirpathi,Nimesh Kumar Shukla
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
List has been revised. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition.
This writ petition is dismissed in default.
Order Date :- 8.2.2023 RKP
Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Samim Bano
State Of U.P.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court