The petitioner sought a writ mandamus to prevent the demolition of his house. The court dismissed the petition on the availability of an efficacious alternative statutory remedy under the Control of National Highways (Land & Traffic) Act, 2002.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:195075-DB
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34350 of 2023 Petitioner :- Anshuman Mishra Respondent :- Union Of India And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Surendra Kumar Chaubey Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.,Rajesh Tripathi
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
Order Date :- 10.10.2023 RKP
Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petition is maintainable despite the existence of an alternative statutory remedy under the Control of National Highways Act, 2002.
Whether the Highways Tribunal had the power to grant interim protection under the Act.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Anshuman Mishra
Union Of India
6 Others
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
