Petitioner appealed for information under RTI Act. Respondent argued alternative remedy under Section 19(1) existed. Court upheld the objection and dismissed the petition, leaving petitioner to approach the appellate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:200018-DB
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28826 of 2023
Petitioner :- Anita Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Himanshu Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Adarsh Bhushan,Kunal Ravi Singh,Vivek Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
Order Date :- 16.10.2023 SP/
Digitally signed by :- SURYA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitioner can bypass the alternative remedy of appeal provided under Section 19(1) of the Right to Information Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anita Devi
State Of U.P.
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
