The writ petition was not pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioners. The High Court dismissed the petition with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:171966
Court No. - 81
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27559 of 2023
Petitioner :- Smt. Pooja And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Sharma,Prashant Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma, J.
Heard Sri Prashant Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Arvind Kumar Singh, Standing Counsel for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners does not wish to press this petition.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to petition to file afresh.
Order Date :- 25.8.2023
Vinod.
Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Pooja
Another
State Of U.P.
Umesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
