In this matter under Article 227, the petitioner sought supervisory jurisdiction over the Patna Bench proceedings at Allahabad High Court. The single judge classified it as an unarranged matter under Article 227, noted its urgent nature, and fixed it for final disposal within six months, ordering parties to file written statements.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:171392
Court No. - 81
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8806 of 2023
Petitioner :- Vipin Kumar Singh Respondent :- Smt. Sonu Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Shukla
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.
Order Date :- 24.8.2023 Pawan Kumar
Digitally signed by :- PAWAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 227 over the proceedings of the Allahabad High Court Patna Bench, or if Article 226 of the Constitution of 2019 is the appropriat
Whether the matter requires immediate filing and disposal within six months as an urgent production under Article 227.
Whether the petition fits within the scope of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 or needs to be disposed of as an un-arranged matter.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Vipin Kumar Singh
Smt. Sonu
Umesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
