Petitioner filed a writ petition mandamus directing Tahsildar to decide mutation cases. Court noted respondent counsel submitted the cases were decided via later dated orders, rendering the petition infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:202690
Court No. - 49
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26312 of 2023
Petitioner :- Mukesh Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alkesh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.
Order Date :- 19.10.2023 Arif
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking direction to decide mutation cases has lost its efficacy.
Mukesh Yadav
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi
Mohammad Arif
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
