Arvind Yadav v. State of U.P. and 9 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
This petition challenged alleged encroachments over public pathway land. The Court held the writ petition was not maintainable as a complete procedural remedy exists under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and dismissed the petition. The petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory remedy.
What did the court decide?
The petition was dismissed; petitioner directed to avail the statutory remedy under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.