The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging interlocutory orders in revisional proceedings under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The Court found the challenged orders tenable in law and allowed the petitioner to file objections in the pending proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:165447
Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24211 of 2023
Petitioner :- Chandra Prakash Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gyanendra Kumar Mishra,Rajiv Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Sher Bahadur Singh
Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.
by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Order Date :- 17.8.2023 Deepak/
Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an interlocutory order in proceedings under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is maintainable by way of Revision.
Whether the High Court should interfere in the impugned orders under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Chandra Prakash
State Of U.P.
Ashutosh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
