The Allahabad High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking an order for the expedited decision of a pending complaint case within three months, dispensing with notice to private respondents considered unnecessary for this limited prayer.
Direction to respondent No.2 Sub-Divisional Officer to decide Case No.T202315060100122 within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:164762
Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24004 of 2023 Petitioner :- Kanti Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Saurabh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- CSC
Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 16.8.2023//Anurag/-
(Ashutosh Srivastava, J.)
Digitally signed by :- ANURAG JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent Sub-Divisional Officer must decide the pending complaint case expeditiously within a fixed time frame.
Whether service of notice upon private respondents is necessary given the limited prayer in the writ petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kanti
State of U.P.
Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, District Azamgarh
Ashutosh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
