This order sustained a writ petition by Vinod against the State of U.P. and the Tahsildar, directing the Tahsildar to decide a pending mutation case under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code within three months without adjournment.
Directed the Tahsildar to decide the pending mutation case within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2234 of 2023
Petitioner :- Vinod Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Navneet Lal Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:-
" (a) issue a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 (Tahsildar Tahsil Nautanwa, Maharajganj) to decide the Computer Case No. T2017054752031719 (Vinod Vs. Phenkoo) Under Section 34 U.P. Revenue Code relating to Mauja/Village Hanumangadhiya, Tappa Lehra, Pargana Haveli, Tahsil Nautanva, District Maharajganj forthwith within stipulated period as directed by this Hon'ble Court. "
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that mutation case is pending consideration before respondent no. 2 since the year 2017, however, till date no order has been passed.
Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State submits that the mutation case will be decided by respondent no. 2 in accordance with law in a time bound manner.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is hereby directed that the mutation case pending before the respondent No. 2 shall be decided within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order without giving any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties.
With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 8.2.2023 VMA
Digitally signed by :- VISHWA MOHAN ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the Tahsildar to decide the pending mutation case within a specific timeframe.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vinod
State Of U.P.
Tahsildar Tahsil Nautanwa
Vikram D. Chauhan
Vishwa Mohan Arora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
