Disposed

Rajesh Kumar Singh v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Allahabad HC11 May 2023WRIC/15969/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking expeditious disposal of a pending revision. It directed the Additional Commissioner, Agra Division, to conclude proceedings within four months, permitting personal appearance if lawyers fail to cooperate.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Additional Commissioner, Agra Division, to conclude proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously within a period of four months.

Rajesh Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. and 7… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:101824

¶2

Court No. - 52

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15969 of 2023

¶4

Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jay Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents.

¶7

This petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Revision No.0099 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. C202101000000099) (Susheel Kumar Vs. Rajesh Kumar) within a stipulated period.

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.

¶9

Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶10

In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Additional Commissioner, Agra Division, Agra (respondent no.2) to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.

¶11

In case the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.

¶12

Order Date :- 11.5.2023 AKShukla/-

¶13

Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rajesh Kumar Singh v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Kumar Singh v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Garg Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Mahesh Vs State of U.P. and 9 Others

Surendra Singh Nagar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Nilesh Singh and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Surendra Das Vs Up Zila Adhikari Kasia and 9 Others

Husiar Khan Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others