Disposed

Surendra Singh Nagar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC10 May 2023WRIC/15854/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Allahabad examined a writ petition seeking a direction for the expeditious disposal of a pending case (State of U.P. v. Gyanendra Singh) where the petitioner alleged serious prejudice due to delay. The Court issued a direction to the Additional District Magistrate to conclude proceedings within one month.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Additional District Magistrate, Gautambuddh Nagar, to conclude the proceedings of Case No.961 of 2022 within one month with full opportunity of hearing.

Surendra Singh Nagar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Landlord and Tenant | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:101471

¶2

Court No. - 52

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15854 of 2023

¶4

Petitioner :- Surendra Singh Nagar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anshul Kumar Singhal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

¶6

1 . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents.

¶7

2. This writ petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of stay application dated 24.02.2023 filed in Case No.961 of 2022 (State of U.P. v. Gyanendra Singh) within stipulated period.

¶8

3 . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.

¶9

4. Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶10

5 . In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed off with a direction to the respondent no.3-Additional District Magistrate (Judicial) District Gautambuddh Nagar to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of one month from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.

¶11

6. In case, the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.

¶12

Order Date :- 10.5.2023 Jyotsana

¶13

Digitally signed by :- JYOTSANA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Surendra Singh Nagar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Singh Nagar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raja Chatar Pratap Singh and 2 Others Vs Commissioner Aligarh and 3 Others

Poonam Devi Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Ram Murti Maurya Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Pankaj Garg Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Mahesh Vs State of U.P. and 9 Others

Smt. Dropadi Devi Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others