Dismissed

Surendra Das v. Up Zila Adhikari Kasia and 9 Others

Allahabad HC11 May 2023WRIC/14052/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Held that proceedings in Case No. T202205440408792 must be concluded expeditiously within four months. The court directed priority disposal despite lawyer non-cooperation, safeguarding property rights.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings in Case No. T202205440408792 to be concluded expeditiously within four months; personal appearance permitted if lawyers do not cooperate.

Surendra Das Vs Up Zila Adhikari Kasia and… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:101764

¶2

Court No. - 52

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14052 of 2023

¶4

Petitioner :- Surendra Das Respondent :- Up Zila Adhikari Kasia And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kr. Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents.

¶7

This petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Case No. T202205440408792 (Surendra Das Vs. Raj Bahadur) within a stipulated period.

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.

¶9

Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶10

In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Up Ziladhikari, Kasia, District Kushinagar (respondent no.1) to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.

¶11

In case the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.

¶12

Order Date :- 11.5.2023 AKShukla/-

¶13

Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Surendra Das v. Up Zila Adhikari Kasia and 9 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Das v. Up Zila Adhikari Kasia and 9 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Garg Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Mahesh Vs State of U.P. and 9 Others

Surendra Singh Nagar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Nilesh Singh and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Rajesh Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. and 7 Others

Husiar Khan Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others