Disposed

Jokhuram and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC16 May 2023WRIC/15570/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought expeditious disposal of Mutation Case No. 6464 of 2022 facing pendency prejudice. Court directed Tehsildar to conclude proceedings within four months with personal appearance provision if lawyers default.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil Phoolpur to conclude mutation case proceedings within four months with personal appearance provision if lawyers default.

Jokhuram and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:106083

¶2

Court No. - 52

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15570 of 2023

¶4

Petitioner :- Jokhuram And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kirt Raj Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents.

¶7

This petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Mutation Case No.6464 of 2022 (Computerized Case No. T202215060306464) (Jokhuram and others Vs. Rajendra Prasad) within a stipulated period.

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.

¶9

Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶10

In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil Phoolpur, District Azamgarh (respondent no.2) to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.

¶11

In case the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.

¶12

Order Date :- 16.5.2023 AKShukla/-

¶13

Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jokhuram and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jokhuram and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aslam Vs Additional Commissioner (Admin)-Ii and 2 Others

Lal Bahadur Vs State of U.P. and 8 Others

Smt. Rita Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Shiv Narayan Vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Ashok Kumar Bharti Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Mustaq Ahmad and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and 7 Others