Disposed

Mustaq Ahmad and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Allahabad HC16 May 2023WRIC/14568/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad disposed of a writ petition seeking a direction for the expeditious disposal of Case No. T-202005310200598 under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code-2006. The Court directed the Sub Divisional Officer to conclude proceedings within six months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to conclude proceedings of Case No. T-202005310200598 expeditiously within six months.

Mustaq Ahmad and 3 Others Vs State of U.P… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:105908

¶2

Court No. - 52

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14568 of 2023

¶4

Petitioner :- Mustaq Ahmad And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nagendra Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudhir Bharti

¶5

Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

¶6

1 . Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents and Shri Sudhir Bharti, learned counsel for the respondent-Gaon Sabha.

¶7

2. This writ petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Case No.T-202005310200598 (Mustaq Ahmad & Ors. v. Maitun Nisha) under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code-2006 within stipulated period.

¶8

3 . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.

¶9

4. Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶10

5 . In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed off with a direction to the respondent no.2-Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil-Khajani, DistrictGorakhpur to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.

¶11

6. In case, the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.

¶12

Order Date :- 16.5.2023

¶13

Jyotsana

¶14

Digitally signed by :- JYOTSANA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mustaq Ahmad and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mustaq Ahmad and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aslam Vs Additional Commissioner (Admin)-Ii and 2 Others

Lal Bahadur Vs State of U.P. and 8 Others

Smt. Rita Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Shiv Narayan Vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Ashok Kumar Bharti Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Jokhuram and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others