Disposed

Smt. Rita Singh and Another v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Allahabad HC15 May 2023WRIC/16249/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition directing the Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Ballia Sadar, to conclude pending mutation case proceedings expeditiously within four months, ensuring full hearing of parties and preventing prejudice from lawyer non-cooperation.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Ballia Sadar, to conclude Mutation Case No. 06972 of 2015 expeditiously within four months.

Smt. Rita Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others — Allahabad HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:104248

¶2

Court No. - 52

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16249 of 2023

¶4

Petitioner :- Smt. Rita Singh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhrigu Jee Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents.

¶7

This petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Mutation Case No.06972 of 2015 (Computerized Case No. T201515090306972) (Manju Singh Vs. Kamala Devi) within a stipulated period.

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioners and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.

¶9

Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners.

¶10

In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Ballia Sadar, District Ballia (respondent no.2) to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.

¶11

In case the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.

¶12

Order Date :- 15.5.2023 AKShukla/-

¶13

Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Smt. Rita Singh and Another v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Rita Singh and Another v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Radha Krishna Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Bechan and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Pratyush Mishra Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Aslam Vs Additional Commissioner (Admin)-Ii and 2 Others

Lal Bahadur Vs State of U.P. and 8 Others

Surya Nath Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others