Single-judge writ case where the petitioner was absent. The High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous by efflux of time though liberty was granted to move for recall.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; liberty granted to move for recall.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 20
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1004031 of 2013
Petitioner :- C/M Saraswati Vidya Mandir Vill. And Post Dakkhin Ga Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Secy. Institutional Finance Lko. And Ors
Counsel for Petitioner :- M.B.Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,G.M.Kamil
Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
Case called out. No one is present on behalf of the Petitioner to press this writ petition.
However, learned Standing Counsel for the State is present.
Perused the record. It appears that the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time.
It is dismissed as infructuous. Consigned to record.
In case the Petitioner feels that the matter survives, liberty is granted to him to move an application for recall of this order.
Order Date :- 6.1.2023 Pks
Digitally signed by :- POOJA KHANNA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
C/M Saraswati Vidya Mandir Vill. And Post Dakkhin Ga
State Of U.P. Through Secy. Institutional Finance Lko. And Ors
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
