The High Court at Allahabad dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear even in the revised call on the filing date of the order.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:67107
Court No. - 8
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1000095 of 2014
Petitioner :- Surya Narain Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Food And Civil Supply And Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Kumar Srivastava,Shikha Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. None has appeared for the petitioner even in the revised call.
2. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 13.10.2023 nishant
Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Surya Narain Tiwari
State Of U.P.
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
