Single judge dismissed the writ petition challenging interlocutory orders without detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:67110
Court No. - 8
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1000071 of 2014
Petitioner :- Anshul Pandey Respondent :- Special Judge Sc/St Act Faizabad And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- Manish Kumar
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The proceedings have been initiated against interlocutory orders passed on the amendment application as well as the dismissal of miscellaneous appeal.
3. I do not see any reason to interfere.
4. The petitioner would be at liberty to take such steps as are required after the final decision is rendered.
5. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 13.10.2023 nishant
Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Anshul Pandey
Special Judge Sc/St Act Faizabad
Others
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
