Petitioners appear with no instructions. The court dismissed the writ petition for want of instructions and vacated any interim order.
Petition dismissed for want of instructions. Interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:44765
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1370 of 1981
Petitioner :- Ram Jatan And Others Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation Faizabad Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K.Mehrotra,I.D.Shukla,Sarju Prasad Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,D.K.Pathak,S.P.Pathak
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners says that he has no instructions in the matter from his client and the present petition may be dismissed for want of instructions.
The aforesaid is not in dispute.
In view of above, the present petition is dismissed for want of instructions.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 11.7.2023 Arun/-
Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ram Jatan And Others
Deputy Director Of Consolidation Faizabad
Saurabh Lavania
Arun Kumar Gangwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
