The petition was dismissed because no one appeared to press it and the petitioner failed to effect service on opposite parties.
Petition dismissed due to non-appearance of petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:44736
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2755 of 2023
Petitioner :- Chandra Kant Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhirendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
Case called out in revised list. No one appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
Office Report dated 27.05.2023 shows that learned counsel for the petitioner failed to take steps for service upon the private opposite parties.
Taking note of the aforesaid as also the order dated 24.05.2023 passed by this Court, the petition is dismissed in view of provisions of Chapter XII Rule 4 of Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952.
Order Date :- 11.7.2023 Arun/-
Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Chandra Kant
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
