High Court bench dismissed a writ petition filed in 2008 for non-prosecution after no one appeared to press the matter on a revised list date.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:44369
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1003069 of 2008
Petitioner :- Malati Devi And 3 Others Respondent :- Sita Devi And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- B.K.Srivastava,Fakhruddin Ali Ahmad
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Desh Mitra Anand,Krishna Nand Shukla,Vinod Kumar Singh Ii
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
(i) Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt (The law assists only those who are vigilant, and not those who sleep over their rights); and
(ii) Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium (In the interest of the society as a whole, the litigation must come to an end).
The above said two maxims are sister provisions, which would highlight and spotlight that the party seeking remedy before the Court should be vigilant, otherwise, the law would not come to their help and there should be end to litigation.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 10.7.2023 Arun/-
Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Malati Devi And 3 Others
Sita Devi And 2 Others
Saurabh Lavania
Arun Kumar Gangwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
