In a default appearance by the petitioner's side, this court dismissed the writ petition without addressing its merits due to the absence of legal representation and lack of request for an adjournment.
The writ petition was dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:78200
Court No. - 22
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3804 of 1999
Petitioner :- Surendra Kumar Awasthi Respondent :- U.P.State Road Transport Corp. Counsel for Petitioner :- G.P.Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
List has been revised.
None is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition nor any request has been made for adjournment of the case.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed in default.
Order Date :- 29.11.2023 Nitesh
Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Surendra Kumar Awasthi
U.P.State Road Transport Corp.
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
