The Apex Court dismissed the contempt application for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear on behalf of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 22
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1721 of 2014
Applicant :- Amar Kumar Opposite Party :- Shri Sadakant Prin.Secy.Housing And Urban Development Lko.Andors Counsel for Applicant :- Shailesh Chandra Tiwary,Dileep Kumar Misra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Nadeem Murtaza,Ratnesh Chandra
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition nor any request has been made for adjournment of the case.
Learned counsel for the respondent is present.
In view thereof, contempt petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 29.11.2023 -Amit K-
Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Amar Kumar
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
