In a contempt application, the court recorded the non-appearance of the applicant's counsel. With no request for adjournment, the court dismissed the petition in default on 29.11.2023.
The contempt application is dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:78486
Court No. - 22
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1030 of 2014
Applicant :- M/S Vardan Enterprises Thru. Prop. Smt. Abhilasha Gupta Opposite Party :- M/S Hindustan Unilever Ltd. Mumbai And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Rohit Jaiswal Counsel for Opposite Party :- Aakash Prasad,Amal Rastogi,Suyash Manjul
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
List has been revised.
None is present on behalf of the petitioner-applicant to press this petition nor any request has been made for adjournment of the case.
Accordingly, the present contempt application is dismissed in default.
Order Date :- 29.11.2023 Nitesh
Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
M/S Vardan Enterprises Thru. Prop. Smt. Abhilasha Gupta
Manish Kumar
Nitesh Kumar Tewary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
