Gange Lal Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner, a nominated counsel, sought mandamus for payment of pending bills for services rendered from March to September 2020. Court declined to entertain on merits due to disputed facts but directed respondent to decide the pending representation within eight weeks.
What did the court decide?
Directed respondent to consider pending representation and take appropriate decision within eight weeks.