Petitioner Chote Lal complained that a writ petition became infructuous after his retirement. The court allowed this submission and dismissed the petition accordingly on the grounds of infructuousness.
Petition dismissed as infructuous due to petitioner's retirement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 21141 of 2022
Petitioner :- Chote Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Singh,Ram Chandra Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the State-respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner has retired, hence, the prayer made in the petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, he prays that the petition may be dismissed as infrcutuous
In view of the aforesaid, the petition is dismissed as infructuous .
Order Date :- 17.2.2023 Rakesh/-
Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Chote Lal
State Of U.P.
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
