The High Court at Allahabad dismissed the filed writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for non-prosecution by the petitioner, in the absence of legal representatives on the day of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2001631 of 2005
Petitioner :- Ram Sanehi Adult And 8 Others Respondent :- Union Of India Through General Manager N.E.R.And 2 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- R.C.Singh,Prashant Kumar Singh,Yash Pal Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- Manik Sinha
Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Case called out.
None is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed for nonprosecution .
( Subhash Vidyarthi, J. )( Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, J. )
Order Date :- 2.3.2023 A.Nigam
Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ram Sanehi Adult And 8 Others
Union Of India Through General Manager N.E.R.And 2 Others
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
