A PIL petition was called out in list but dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner was absent on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 150 of 2023
Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Dwivedi And Others Respondent :- The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Ayra,Ravi Kumar Dwivedi
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one is present on behalf of the petitioners.
The petition is,thus, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 2.3.2023 Renu/-
Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Arvind Kumar Dwivedi And Others
The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Lko. And Others
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
