Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as neither the petitioner nor any slip for passing was present during hearing. Interim order vacated.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2000638 of 2005
Petitioner :- Mishri Lal
Respondent :- Union Of India Through Chairman Railway And 2 Ors
Counsel for Petitioner :- P.D Verma,G.S. Bisht,R.J. Trivedi Counsel for Respondent :- A.K.Chaturvedi,Ambrish Rai,Anil Srivastava,C S C,Pankaj Srivastava,Ram Phal
Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Case called out.
None present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition nor any slip for passing over or adjournment has been sent.
Learned Standing Counsel is present on behalf of the State.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) (D.K. Upadhyaya, J.)
Order Date :- 2.3.2023 Ram.
Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Mishri Lal
Union Of India
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
