The High Court dismissed a writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear to press the matter on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 22
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2001376 of 2001 Petitioner :- Prabhu Nath Misra Respondent :- The State Of U.P.Through Secy. Counsel for Petitioner :- P.L.Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Case is called out in the revised list.
No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition.
Learned counsel for respondents are present.
In view thereof, petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 29.11.2023 -Amit K-
Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Prabhu Nath Misra
The State Of U.P.Through Secy.
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
