The petitioner challenged an order of suspension pending inquiry. Since the disciplinary proceedings were concluded and the petitioner was reinstated before the writ was decided, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:235516
Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18877 of 2023
Petitioner :- Arvind Singh Yadav @ Arvind Yadav Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar,Mohd Rehan Ansari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Girjesh Mishra,Rahul Jain
Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.
Mr. Rahul Jain, Advocate and Ms. Girjesh Mishra, Advocate have appeared on behalf of respondent no.2.
Mr. Rahul Jain, Advocate has placed before the Court an order dated 05.12.2023, whereby the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner have been decided and punishing him with nonpayment of salary for the period of suspension, he has been reinstated in service.
This writ petition, which is directed against an order of suspension pending inquiry, has therefore been rendered infructuous. It is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
However, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 05.12.2023, in such manner as he desires.
Order Date :- 12.12.2023
Vijay
Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Arvind Singh Yadav @ Arvind Yadav
State of U.P.
J.J. Munir
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
