Mahendra Nath Dixit v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
In a PIL filing as infructuous, the Allahabad High Court dismissed the petition without engaging with substantive issues on the merits.
In a PIL filing as infructuous, the Allahabad High Court dismissed the petition without engaging with substantive issues on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2034 of 2023
Petitioner :- Mahendra Nath Dixit Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.K.Paramhans Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,Chief Justice Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Order Date :- 19.9.2023 SK
(Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) (Pritinker Diwaker,CJ.)
Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahendra Nath Dixit
State Of U.P.
Pritinker Diwaker
Ashutosh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court