Petitioners challenged issues regarding land plotting, demolition, and flooding in a colony. The High Court held disputed questions of fact existed and disposed of the writ petition, permitting alternative remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:179482-DB
Chief Justice's Court
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 31877 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rampal Gupta And 39 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satya Prakash Pandey,Raj Kishor Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Sant Ram Sharma
Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,Chief Justice Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.
(i) that they are living in a colony named as 'Swaroop Colony' in which apart from them as many as about 300 other houses are built;
(ii) that certain private land, adjacent to the petitioners' colony, has been allegedly purchased by certain private persons and now plotting is being done;
(iii) that on account of demolition of 8 ft. wall existing in the colony, various problems including the problem of flood is being caused to the residents;
Order Date :- 18.9.2023 Brijesh Maurya
(Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) (Pritinker Diwaker,CJ.)
Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rampal Gupta And 39 Others
State Of U.P. And 10 Others
Ashutosh Srivastava
Pritinker Diwaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
