The Second Appeal filed in 1989 was dismissed for want of prosecution because no counsel appeared for the appellant despite the court's specific direction that cases shall not be adjourned.
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:59718
Court No. - 19
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 545 of 1989
Appellant :- Abdul Sattar And Others Respondent :- Amjad Counsel for Appellant :- Mohd. Abid Ali,Mohammad Abid Ali,Mohd. Abid Ali,T.R.Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Avadhesh Kumar,Jamir Husain,Rajesh Kumar,Smt.Atiya Abid
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
The matter is listed today under the heading that "These Cases Shall Not Be Adjourned".
The appeal is of the year 1989.
None appeared for either of the parties.
In absence of the learned counsel for the appellants, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Consigned to record.
Order Date :- 18.9.2023 Rakesh/-
Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Abdul Sattar and Others
Amjad
Jaspreet Singh
Rakesh Prajapat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
