The Allahabad High Court dismissed a second appeal for want of prosecution as neither party appeared on the convenience date in 2023.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:59281
Court No. - 19
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 673 of 1988
Appellant :- Nagar Palika And Another Respondent :- M/S V.K.Automobiles And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Pradeep Kant Counsel for Respondent :- Sanjay Kumar
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
The appeal is of the year 1988. The record indicates that the appeal has not been admitted rather notices were issued on Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The record further indicates that on 09.08.2023, none appeared for either of the parties even in the revised call. Today again none has put in appearance.
Considering the aforesaid, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Consigned to record.
Order Date :- 15.9.2023 ank
Digitally signed by :- ALI NEWAZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Nag ar Palika And Another
M/S V.K.Automobiles And Others
JASPREET SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
